1) Relate what was discussed in class or the text to the
screening.
Richard Linklater is for sure one of the best directors and
story tellers since the 1990’s. He does an excellent job of taking stories with
very little or no plot and making them interesting. He knows how to create
characters that appear realistic but also have their very own unique
personality. Dazed and Confused, Boyhood,
and Slacker are three of his more popular movies that follow the idea of
telling a story without much of a plot. Dazed
and Confused follows a group of high school students on the last day of
school, and while it’s a highly entertaining movie there is little very little
plot compared to many typical Hollywood movies. A similar concept is used in Slacker, as well as Linklater’s latest
film Boyhood. Both films follow a
similar story structure without much of a plot but in the case of Boyhood and Dazed and Confused, Linklater does an amazing job of telling his
stories through the development and growth of his characters. Linklater also
has the great ability to make his dialogue sound very natural which makes the
movie very easy to relate to as an audience.
2) Find a related article (on the film, director, studio,
actor/actress, artistic content, etc.) and summarize the content.
The article from The Hollywood Reporter titled “Richard
Linklater Spills Secrets on His Films, From 'Dazed and Confused' to 'Boyhood'”,
discusses some of Linklater’s more well known works and how he became the
director that he is today. Linklater made his first experimental film in 1991
called Slacker. The movie does not
really have an actual plot but it was made on an extremely small budget of only
$23,000 and is now seen as a cult classic. That led Linklater to his next film Dazed and Confused. Linklater included a
lot from his personal life in Dazed and
Confused as he would have been 16 years old at the time when the movie took
place. Dazed and Confused is a little
more structured than Slacker but
still lacks a traditional plot line that most movies have. "I've largely
replaced the notion of conventional story with a time structure," says
Linklater. Dazed and Confused was not
instantly recognized by critics and audiences but quickly gained a following
once it was released on video. Linklater’s overall success from Dazed and Confused let him to work on
future movies such as Before Sunrise,
Waking Life, Scanner Darkly and his most recent Boyhood, which all follow loose story structures and reasonably low
budgets. Even though his movies appear to have lose stories, Linklater focuses
a lot on getting the movie right on the script first which he thinks gives his
films a lot more structure than many people think. Linklater has his own style
of writing and directing and it the reason why he has been able to make so many
unique pieces.
3) Apply the article to the film screened in class.
The article from The Hollywood Reporter which summarizes
Linlater’s more memorable films and gives insight to him as a director. Linklater’s
style is definitely apparent in his 1993 film Dazed and Confused. Dazed and
Confused has a fairly lose plot line as do many of Linklater’s other films.
Even though there is little plot in the film, the final product was most likely
very similar to the original script that Linklater wrote. The article
definitely supported my current opinion of Linklater as a writer and director.
In my opinion he is one of the great auteur style directors of our time. He
knows how to create these great stories that may be based off of true events or
personal stories and he knows how to put the thoughts from his mind onto the
screen. He is a visionary in the true literal sense of the word, and Dazed and Confused makes that very
apparent. Linklater was able to take some of his own personal experiences from
high school in the 1970’s and capture them with a great cast of characters.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/richard-linklater-spills-secrets-his-757621
4) Write a critical analysis of the film, including your
personal opinion, formed as aresult of the screening, class discussions, text
material and the article.
Richard Linklater’s film Dazed
and Confused, sheds a light on what it was like to be a teenager in Texas
in the 70’s. The film has a great set of characters, and without them the movie
would be nothing. Even though the film takes place in the 70’s, many of the
themes and events that take place in the film can apply to teenagers from any
time period. One of the other reasons why the film is so great is because it is
such a good hangout movie. The dialogue between the characters is so smooth and
natural that at times when watching the movie you feel like you are actually
with the characters in each scene. The also does a great job of not singling
out any particular group or clique, when watching the film as an audience you
get to learn about all the different groups that make up a school as a whole.
You see the freshman, misfits, stoners, and jocks all interacting in one place,
giving you the feeling of what it what be like to be at that school. Lastly,
one of the biggest reasons why the characters are developed so well is because
of the script that was written by Linklater. The banter back and forth between
characters makes the movie flow very well and the comments he makes on school
and authority figures reassures you what life would have been like growing up
in the 70’s. Overall, Linklater’s film is a cult classic and I think will
forever be seen as a movie that defines what it’s like being a teenager in the
1970’s.
CHECKLIST FOR PLAGIARISM 1) ( x) I have not handed in this assignment for any
other class. 2) ( x) If I reused any information from other papers I have written for other
classes, I clearly explain that in the paper. 3) (x ) If I used any passages word for word, I
put quotations around those words, or used indentation and citation within the text. 4) (
x) I have not padded the bibliography. I have used all sources cited in the bibliography in
the text of the paper. 5) ( x) I have cited in the bibliography only the pages I personally
read. 6) (x ) I have used direct quotations only in cases where it could not be stated in
another way. I cited the source within the paper and in the bibliography. 7) (x ) I did not
so over-use direct quotations that the paper lacks interpretation or originality. 8) (x ) I
checked yes on steps 1-7 and therefore have been fully transparent about the research and
ideas used in my paper.
Name: _____Joe Katulak_______________ Date: __3/31/15________

No comments:
Post a Comment